stackpicks.dev
All comparisons
Open-source comparison · Browser automation

puppeteervsplaywright

Playwright supports Chromium + Firefox + WebKit. Puppeteer is Chrome-only. Playwright has better selectors, auto-waiting, and parallel test orchestration. Pick Playwright unless you have a specific Puppeteer dependency.

Option A
puppeteer

puppeteer

github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer

Chrome-only browser automation from Google. Slightly more raw than Playwright with fewer batteries included, but lighter weight and battle-tested on Chrome quirks. The choice when Playwright's multi-browser layer is unnecessary.

Full review →
Option B
microsoft

playwright

github.com/microsoft/playwright

End-to-end browser testing. ~65k stars. Beat Cypress on speed, parallelism, and multi-browser support. Default for E2E testing in 2026.

Full review →

Which should you pick?

Pick puppeteer if…

You're Chrome-only and want a thinner abstraction than Playwright.

Skip puppeteer if…

You need Firefox or Safari support — Playwright handles those, Puppeteer does not.

Pick playwright if…

You are writing E2E tests for a web app.

Skip playwright if…

You only need unit tests — use Vitest.

Still picking? Get the full curated stack.

StackPicks members get 100+ open-source tools with curator takes, 13 ready-to-ship stack bundles, and 12 skill tracks. ₹99 lifetime.

See pricing

More Browser automation comparisons

puppeteer vs playwright — GitHub Repo Comparison (Honest 2026 Take) — StackPicks — StackPicks